Kivivi Blog

Beauty|Personal Care|Wellness|Health|Fitness|Diet|Nutrition 
Filed under

Cosmetics

 

We Can't See Them, But EU Wants to Better Regulate Nanoparticles in Sunblock, Lipstick, Creams

On Wednesday a majority of the the EU Parliament voted for new EU-wide rules regarding nanocosmetics to take effect in 2012. Nanoparticles may already be a part of your life you just don't know too much about - they are in underwear, socks, and other performance clothing - and another area that could have used a bit of the precautionary principle before consumer products were launched on markets. But is there real cause for concern?

The EU's new regulations, which received a majority vote at a Wednesday meeting, are meant to bring more safety to the industry - manufacturers of wrinkle creams, sun lotions and lipsticks that contain specialized nanoparticles would be required to undergo special safety testing before products are released. If the product was found to be harmful it would not be allowed. These rules won't even start until 2012, plus any products already on the market are exempt. From 2012 products will be labeled if they contain nanoparticles toward a specific usage - as the copper in self-tanners .

Today about 5 percent of cosmetics contain nanoparticles but are generally not labeled for consumers. Of special concern are the copper nanoparticles inserted into self-tanning creams. Scientists don't yet know what size of nanoparticles could get into the human bloodstream and cause problems, including clots. Sweden has already banned 27 different sun creams that contained nanoparticles of zinc oxide (but mostly due to the fact that zinc oxide has never been approved as a shield against UV rays).

Recent research in Scientific American has shown that nanoparticles may cause environmental damage by killing beneficial microbes in municipal water and sewage systems. On the other hand, nanogold particles are showing promise in cancer treatments.

The new regulation is the first time that nanomaterials have been addressed in EU legislation. The European Consumers' Association says the new legislation does not go far enough as it still allows general nanomaterials usage without notifying consumers.


Filed under  //   Beauty   Cosmetics   Naonoparticles   Safety  
Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]

Beauty in India

From beauty queens to Bollywood stars to the average woman walking the busy city streets, the women of India take their beauty very seriously.

The pursuit of beauty has been instilled in the Indian psyche for centuries and is an intrinsic part of the country’s long and rich history. From the 15th-century list called the Solah Shringar, the poet Vallabhadeva’s enumeration of 16 decorations for a model Hindu wife, to the Ayurvedic health and grooming treatments that have been used for more than 2,000 years, Indian women grow up knowing how to make the best of what they have.

The Indian beauty industry can be divided into cosmetics and grooming — and the public’s perception of both categories has started to change radically in recent years.

According to Anil Chopra, a beauty and fashion adviser at Hindustan Unilever, cosmetics were considered luxuries until the late 1980’s. At the same time, it was generally considered unsuitable for girls from good families to be seen in makeup.

‘‘It was taboo for the unmarried woman, but the other side of it was that, when you got married, you needed to wear makeup because you needed to look good for your husband,’’ Mr. Chopra says.

Over the past decade, the taboo has started to fade under the glaring light of the global media. Western movies, television and magazines, as well as a growing fascination with the styles of international and Bollywood stars, have made wearing makeup an acceptable practice, at least in the major cities.

Lakmé, the Unilever-owned beauty company with 45,000 outlets around India, has solidified its dominance of the local market as a result of that change; growth has also been driven by the growing number of woman entering the workforce.

‘‘Women, especially in the big cities, are getting married later and later,’’ says Monisha Bharadwaj, author of ‘‘India’s Beauty Secrets.’’ ‘‘They are becoming much more financially independent now. And women going into the workplace know they now have to be groomed properly, wearing makeup and jewelry.’’

As a result, India is one of the beauty industry’s fastest-emerging markets, with sales growing 18 percent to 20 percent a year during each of the last several years, Mr. Chopra says. Although the industry is still very small, with $500 million in annual sales compared with more than $16 billion worldwide, Mr. Chopra says the kind of growth — with buyers upgrading to better brands, rather than just buying more items — is what is really interesting.

This is music to the ears of global brands like Estée Lauder, which introduced its MAC makeup brand to India about four years ago and now has five stores around the country. ‘‘India represents a huge opportunity for MAC,’’ says John Demsey, whose role as group president of the Estée Lauder Companies includes supervision of the MAC brand. He noted that MAC recently collaborated on a special line with the Indian designer Manish Arora.

Estée Lauder introduced its Clinique line to India in 2007 and its Estée Lauder line last year. But it recently invested in the Indian brand Forest Essentials, which primarily sells products based on ancient Sanskrit Ayurvedic formulations.

‘‘We wanted to get an even better understanding of the market, so we wanted to invest in a local luxury brand with a natural, organic base,’’ says Daniel Rachmanis, a senior vice president of international business development at Estée Lauder. ‘‘Not just because it was rooted in the Ayurveda belief, which is something a number of local mass beauty brands are based on, but the luxury aspect of the brand made Forest Essentials a very appealing investment.’’

The focus on naturally based products, seen through the prism of a luxury brand, is an interesting development for the Indian grooming market — a market in which natural grooming products are readily available.

‘‘The grassroots Indian woman is still using natural products, which are available to her free of costs,’’ says Ms. Bharadwaj. ‘‘And, at the end of the day, she doesn’t think of them as being any less quality than say, what Stella McCartney is providing, for instance. You know, if she is seeing a designer brand selling a strawberry or mango face mask, well she’ll just use pure mango; it’s only going to be better.’’

Mr. Chopra agrees: ‘‘Natural skin and hair products are available at every corner, every roadside.’’ And, he adds, that availability means Western brands will not have an automatic aspirational appeal.

Perhaps the path to a successful luxury line of natural skin care and grooming products can be though the spa and salon industries, which are expanding with the country’s increase in wealth. The number of Indians with more than $1 million in assets grew 22 percent, to 167,000, in the last year, the best rate of growth in any Asian country, according to the 2008 CapGemini Merrill Lynch Asia Pacific Wealth Report.

And along with that growth has come 12-hour workdays and longer workweek, driving a craving for pampering among Indian workers.

The Unilever group alone has opened 120 salons and 46 spas across India, most of them in the last six years.

‘‘I think this will be the next big thing the country will see,’’ says Mr. Chopra. ‘‘It’s going to explode.’’

 

Filed under  //   Beauty   Cosmetics   India   Makeup  
Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]

Two rivals in the business of beauty

Cosmetics industry pioneers Elizabeth Arden (left) and Helena Rubinstein are profiled in PBS's ''The Powder and the Glory.'' Cosmetics industry pioneers Elizabeth Arden (left) and Helena Rubinstein are profiled in PBS's ''The Powder and the Glory.'' (Elizabeth arden archives (left); helena rubinstein foundation)
By Matthew Gilbert Globe Staff / March 23, 2009

There's a comic irony underlying "The Powder and the Glory," a smart new PBS documentary about two pioneers of the cosmetics industry. During their lives, entrepreneurial giants Elizabeth Arden and Helena Rubinstein chose never to meet, even while they lived and worked in the same neighborhood. They were rivals of the first order. But here they are, stuck side by side in the same film, twin symbols of the dramatic changes in the beauty business in the 20th century.

Discuss
COMMENTS (0)

THE POWDER AND THE GLORY On: PBS, Channel 2

Time: Tonight, 10-11:30

"The Powder and the Glory," which airs tonight at 10 on Channel 2, portrays two women who came from radically different backgrounds, but who shared an acute understanding of a woman's right to wear what she pleased. They took a type of product that, until the early 20th century, was identified with prostitution and impropriety, and they fused it with female self-esteem. While the film is a dual biography of Arden and Rubinstein, it is also a portrait of a century of changing mores.

In 1872, Rubinstein was born into a poor family in Poland, and by the time she got to America she was mixing skin creams. A Jew, she faced anti-Semitism on her ascent in the business world, but she persisted, and expanded her product line into an entire lifestyle. Arden, too, understood the importance of turning makeup into something more than simply face paint. She linked buying face products with the total woman, from posture to exercise.

Arden was also born into a poor family, in Canada in 1881, and moved to New York City. The branding she went on to develop was all about femininity, pink colors, and a life of leisure. Rubinstein's branding had more to do with bold colors and an urban milieu.

Narrated by Jane Alexander, "The Powder and the Glory" follows these two larger-than-life women through the Depression, when cosmetic sales actually rose. The movie also makes interesting points about the role of movies in the growing popularity of makeup during the 1900s, as the camera got close up to actresses' faces. Alas, while Rubinstein and Arden were savvy in business for decades, they failed to get on board the TV-advertising wagon and lost the chance to appeal to younger women.

"The Powder and the Glory" was written, produced, and directed by local filmmakers Ann Carol Grossman and Arnie Reisman. Using lots of old film footage, interspersed with commentary by professors, authors, the late Kitty Carlisle Hart, and Twiggy, they portray not only a pair of icons but a powerful shift in the definition of beauty.

Matthew Gilbert can be reached at gilbert@globe.com. For more on TV, visit www.boston.com/ae/tv/blog.

© Copyright 2009 Globe Newspaper Company.

Filed under  //   Beauty   Cosmetics  
Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]

P&G Flirts With Luxury Cosmetics

Historically, women have gravitated toward lipsticks and other inexpensive pick-me-ups during recessions. This recession poses new challenges. Drug stores and discount retailers have expanded their beauty sections, hoping to sway shoppers with their lower-cost selection.
Read how P&G wants to seduce American women with upscale cosmetics and makeup via online.wsj.com

 

Filed under  //   Beauty   Cosmetics   Makeup   Personal Care  
Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]

Do you know which 12 Toxic Chemicals you should Avoid in Makeup?

Read more about the Toxic 12 list as compiled by Susan Jeske, a former Ms. America via blogs.orlandosentinel.com

Apparently, cosmetics and skin care are the least-regulated consumer products in the market. According to Jeske, “More than 1,100 harmful chemicals used in personal care items have been banned in most European countries. In the U.S. only 10 have been banned.”

 

Filed under  //   Beauty   Chemicals   Cosmetics   Makeup   Personal Care   Skincare   Toxic 12  
Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]

Oh Canada! Canada First to Ban Chemicals in Personal Care Products



 
 

via Spa Beautifully by Colleen Coplick on 2/7/09

The Canadian government recently declared two chemicals used in lipstick and other personal care products to be toxic to the environment. Officials are saying that the two chemicals, siloxanes D4 and D5, aren’t used in large enough quantities to be of concern to people yet, however two other chemicals used in cosmetics were found to be harmful to people’s health.

The two siloxanes are used as emollients to soften the skin and are found in many of the personal care products on the market in North America. They’re also used in paints and coatings, antiperspirants, sealants, lubricants, plastics, silicone polymers, food additives and medical devices. Whew. And we’ve been able to put this onto our bodies? Ick.

Two other substances used in cosmetics were found to be of concern  - isoprene and epichlorohydrin - both of which are considered to be human carcinogens. Yeah, that’d be cancer. Great.

These will all added to the Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist to prevent their future use in cosmetics. For isoprene, Health Canada is suggesting  that manufacturers use best-available technology to control releases.

Although peoples’ exposure to the substances of concern to human health is very low, the government is proposing regulations for all except isoprene to prevent them from being used in the future without undergoing a new series of assessments.

"Today’s move by Canada is not only important for the health of its citizens, it helps underscore the need for real reforms within the EPA’s failed programs to regulate toxins in the U.S.," said Jane Houlihan, vice president for research with the Environmental Working Group based in Washington, DC.

"Congress and President Obama need to overhaul broken toxics laws," she said, "and establish a policy that forces the chemical companies to first prove their products are safe before being used." [source]

Share This

Filed under  //   Beauty   Chemicals   Cosmetics   Health   Lipstick   Personal Care   Skincare  
Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]

Women sacrifice food before cosmetics

Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]

The Potential For Organic And Eco-Friendly Beauty

Posted by Kivivi 

Comments [0]